CN730 -- Models of Visual Perception -- Spring, 2005

Prerequisites : Consent of the instructor, Ennio Mingolla 
Office hours: Mondays, 10:00 AM to noon

The 2005 edition of this course offers an advanced survey of selected topics of current interest in the neural and computational modeling of mammalian vision. This year's topics include perceptual consequences of eye movements, motion perception, binocular vision, and object recognition. Several classes will be held at laboratories of nearby institutions. Students are expected to have a sufficient interdisciplinary grounding in the fundamentals of computational modeling of mammalian vision to read primary research sources extensively. A term project that combines a problem statement, literature review, and either (1) simulation of a model or (2) a design for a psychophysical experiment is required.

Answers to FREQUENTLY-ASKED QUESTIONS about CN 730

Information for GUEST SPEAKERS

Dates of DELIVERABLES for student research reports

Weekly Schedule -- Meetings are on Thursdays, beginning on January 20, and start at 1:00 PM, unless otherwise indicated on this page by the designation "field trip." Meetings with guest speakers at Boston University are held in Room B03 of the CNS Building, 677 Beacon Street. An additional weekly discussion hour is held at 11:30 on Tuesdays, beginning January 25, in Room B01.

Click on a date to go directly to a summary of that week's class, including assigned readings. Links to guest speakers' home pages, weekly topics, and a list of readings will also be found there, though these will be updated in real time in the course of the semester.

Jan 20     Organizational meeting
Jan 27     Rick Born and Chris Pack -- field trip
Feb 3      Michele Rucci

Feb 10    Moshe Bar

Feb 17    Aude Oliva

Feb 24    Piers Howe and Marge Livingstone -- field trip

Mar 3      Aaron Seitz -- AT CNS, at usual time, on THURSDAY!!!
Mar 10    No class (spring break)
Mar 17    Peter Schiller  -- field trip
Mar 24    Arash Fazl and Marc Pomplun

Mar 31    Marc Pomplun and Arash Fazl
Apr 7       Ken Nakayama

Apr 14       Rushi Bhatt and Steve Grossberg

Apr 21     Student presentations
Apr 26     Student presentations -- NOTE: This is a Tuesday, starting time is 9:30 AM.


Jan 27 -- Rick Born and Chris Pack (field trip: Harvard Med; map)
       
Background
Born, R. T. and Bradley. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. (details forthcoming)

Core Readings
Pack, C. C., Berezovskii, V. K. and Born, R. T. (2001) Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert and anesthetized macaque monkeys. Nature, 414:905-908. pdf available at: http://www.hms.harvard.edu/bss/neuro/bornlab/

Pack, C. C., Gartland, A. J. and Born, R. T. (2004) Integration of contour and terminator signals in visual area MT of alert macaque. J. Neurosci., 24:3268-3280. pdf available at: http://www.hms.harvard.edu/bss/neuro/bornlab/

Supplementary
Salzman, C.D., Britten, K.H., and Newsome, W.T. Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction. Nature 346, 174-7 (1990).

Salzman, C.D., Murasugi, C.M., Britten, K.H., and Newsome, W.T. Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance. J. Neurosci. 12, 2331-55 (1992).

Related

Bershanzkaya, J., Grossberg, S., and Mingolla, E. Laminar cortical dynamics of visual form and motion interactions
during coherent object motion perception. Technical Report CAS/CNS-TR-2004-011, Boston University. -- download

Back to top of page


Feb 3      Michele Rucci

Core Readings
Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, and Hubel DH (2004) The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nature Rev Neurosci 5:229-240. download

M. Rucci, G.M. Edelman and J. Wray “Modeling LGN responses during free-viewing: A possible role of microscopic eye movements in the refinement of cortical orientation selectivity”, Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 12, 4708-4720, 2000. download

Snodderly DM, Kagan I, and Gur M (2001) Selective activation of visual cortex neurons by fixational eye movements: Implications for neural coding. Vis Neurosci 18:259-277. download

Steinman RM, Haddad GM, Skavenski AA, and Wyman D (1973) Miniature eye movement. Science 181:810-819. download


Supplementary
Atick JJ and Redlich A (1992) What does the retina know about natural scenes? Neural Comp 4:449-572.

Greschner M, Bongard M, Rujan P, and Ammermfuller J (2002) Retina ganglion cell synchronization by Fxational eye movements improves feature estimation. Nature 5:341-347.

Gur M, Beylin A, and Snodderly DM (1997) Response variability of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) of alert monkeys. J Neurosci 17:2914-2920.

Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, and Hubel DH (2000) Microsaccadic eye movements and fring of single cells in the striate cortex of macaque monkeys. Nat Neurosci 3:251-258.

Olveczky B, Baccus S, and Meister M (2003) Segregation of object and background motion in the retina. Nature 423:401-408.

M. Rucci and A. Casile, “Fixational instability and natural image statistics: Implications for early visual representations”, submitted manuscript and Boston University Technical Report CAS/CNSTR-04-014, 2004.

M. Rucci and A. Casile “Decorrelation of neural activity during fixational eye movements: Possible implications for the refinement of V1 receptive fields”, Visual Neuroscience, in press.

M. Rucci and G. Desbordes, “Contributions of fixational eye movements to the discrimination of briefly presented stimuli”, Journal of Vision, 3(11), 852-864, 2003.
Back to top of page


Feb 10 -- Moshe Bar

The Contribution of Top-Down Predictions to Object Recognition

Core Readings (all of the core readings are downloadable from here)

M. Bar (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 5, 619-629.

M. Bar and E. Aminoff (2003). Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron, 38, 347-358.

M. Bar (2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 600-609.

M. Bar, R. Tootell, D. Schacter, D. Greve, B. Fischl, J. Mendola, B. Rosen and A. M. Dale (2001). Cortical mechanisms of explicit visual object recogntion. Neuron, 29, 529-535.

Supplementary (The following items contain useful background on fMRI methods.)

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain: data acquisition and analysis. Turner R, Howseman A, Rees GE, Josephs O, Friston K, Exp. Brain. Res., 123, 5-12 (1998)

Functional magnetic resonance imaging with echo planar imaging. Kwong KK, Magn. Reson. Q., 11, 1-20 (1995)

Heeger, DJ and Ress, D. (2002). What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 142-151.

Functional and structural mapping of human cerebral cortex: solutions are in the surfaces. Van Essen, D.C., Drury, H.A., Joshi, S., and Miller, M.I. 1998. PNAS 95: 788-795.

Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction Anders M. Dale, Bruce Fischl, and Martin I. Sereno. 1999. NeuroImage 9: 195-207.

Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System Bruce Fischl, Martin I. Sereno, and Anders M. Dale. 1999. NeuroImage 9: 179-194.

Echo planar imaging: MRI in a fraction of a second. Stehling MK, Turner R, Mansfield P, Science, 254, 43-50 (1990

Back to top of page


Feb 17 --  Aude Oliva

Core readings

Scene-Centered Description from Spatial Envelope Properties.
Oliva, A. & Torralba, A. (2002). Lecture Note in Computer Science Serie. Proc.
2nd Workshop on Biologically Motivated Computer Vision, Tuebingen, Germany. download

Torralba, A. (in press, 2005). Contextual influences on saliency. Neurobiology
of Attention. Eds. L. Itti, G. Rees and J. Tsotsos. Academic Press / Elsevier. download

Supplementary
-- Note that expanded versions of the two core readings are the first two papers in the following list.

Oliva, A. & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42(3), 145-175. download

A. Torralba. (2003). Modeling global scene factors in attention. Journal of Optical Society of America A. Special Issue on Bayesian and Statistical Approaches to Vision. Vol. 20(7), pages 1407-1418. download

Chun, M. (2004). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in cognitive science, 4, 5, 170-178. download

Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-501. download

Henderson, J.M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 11, 498-504. download

Oliva, A. (in press). Gist of a Scene. In Neurobiology of Attention. Eds. L. Itti, G. Rees and J. Tsotsos. Academic Press, Elsevier. download

Torralba, A., Oliva, A. (2003). Statistics of Natural Images Categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14, 391-412. download

Rousselet, G., & Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S.J. (2002). Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 629-630. download

Back to top of page


Feb 24 -- Piers Howe and Marge Livingstone (field trip: Harvard Med; map)

Binocular vision and stereo correspondence problem

Abstract: The brain can achieve depth perception by comparing the images on the left and right retinas, an ability known as stereopsis. To do this the visual system must first determine for each point in one retinal image which point in the other originated from the same point in the visual scene. How the brain identifies such corresponding points remains controversial. Here we show that some neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) can solve some instances of this correspondence problem. The initial responses of these cells are uninformative but after a delay of 60 ms the neurons respond only to the disparity between corresponding points in the two retinal images. Such cells would appear to play a crucial role in binocular vision.

Background

Blake R, Wilson HR. Neural models of stereoscopic vision. Trends in Neurosciences , 1991 Oct;14(10):445-52. download

Core Readings
Livingstone, M.S. and Tsao, D. Y. (1999). Receptive fields of disparity-selective neurons in the macaque striate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(9), 825-832
 
Pack, C.C., Livingstone, M.S., Duffy, K.D., and Born, R.T. (2003). End-stopping and the aperture problem: Two-dimensional motion signals in macaque V1. Neuron, 39, 671-680.
 

Back to top of page


Mar 3      Aaron Seitz

Back to top of page


Mar 17    Peter Schiller  -- field trip

While exploring Peter Schiller's web site, pay particular attention to the part of the research section labeled:

2. The Neural Control of Visually Guided Eye Movements:

Readings

P.H. Schiller, the neural control of visually guided eye movements.  Ed:  J. Richards, IN: Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, Erlbaum, 1998.

E.J. Tehovnik, M.A. Sommer, I. Chou, W.M. Slocum and P.H. Schiller, Eye fields in the frontal lobes of primates, Brain Research Reviews, 32, 2000, 413-448.
download from ScienceDirect

 

Back to top of page


Mar 24    Arash Fazl and Marc Pomplun

Note: Readings for this and the following week appear as a single list below.

Background

Liversedge SP, Findlay JM. 2000. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 6-14 -- download from ScienceDirect

Henderson, A. and Hollingworth, J.M. High-level scene perception. Annu.Rev.Psychol.1999.50:243Œ71-- download

Core Readings

Pomplun, M., Shen, J. & Reingold, E.M. (2003). Area activation: A computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search. Cognitive Science 27,299 - 312.
http://www.cs.umb.edu/~marc/pubs/pomplun_et_al_COGSCI.pdf

Pomplun, M., Reingold, E.M. & Shen, J. (2001). Peripheral and parafoveal cueing and masking effects on saccadic selectivity in a gaze-contingent window paradigm. Vision Research 41, 2757 - 2769.
http://www.cs.umb.edu/~marc/pubs/pomplun_et_al_visionres2001.pdf

Pomplun, M., Velichkovsky, B.M. & Ritter, H. (1996). Disambiguating complex visual information: Towards communication of personal views of a scene. Perception 25 (8), 931-948.download

Pomplun, M., Reingold, E.M. & Shen, J. (2001). Investigating the visual span in comparative search: The effects of task difficulty and divided attention.Cognition 81, B57-B67.
http://www.cs.umb.edu/~marc/pubs/pomplun_et_al_cognition2001.pdf

Back to top of page


Mar 31    Marc Pomplun and Arash Fazl

Note: See entry for previous week.

Back to top of page


Apr 7        Ken Nakayama

Reading

McPeek, R.M., Skavenski, A.,  Nakayama, K. (2000) Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 2499-2516. download


Back to top of page


Apr 14        Rushi Bhatt and Steve Grossberg

Core Readings

Grossberg, S. (1968). Some physiological and biochemical consequences of psychological postulates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 60, 758-765. download
Grossberg, S. (1980). Biological competition: Decision rules, pattern formation, and oscillations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 77, 2338-2342. download

Additional Readings -- Available at Steve's web site.
Grossberg, S. (1973). Contour enhancement, short-term memory, and constancies in reverberating neural networks. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 52, 213-257.

Cohen, M.A. and Grossberg, S. (1983). Absolute stability of global pattern formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 815-826


Back to top of page


Last Updated 31 Mar 2005

This page is maintained by Ennio Mingolla

Please direct questions to: ennio@cns.bu.edu